Charterblog

Analysis of Victoria’s Charter of Human Rights

The almost cool Charter

king-cobra.jpgWhile on the subject of the Charter’s  full name, one flaw is that it doesn’t yield a good acronym. CHRR? CHRAR? COHRAR? It just doesn’t work in the way that ACTHRA and NZBORA  do.

But it might have. Section 6 of the Charter provides that:

(1) Only persons have human rights. All persons have the human rights set out in Part 2.  

And the Charter’s definition section defines a person to mean ‘a human being‘.

So, it could have been the Charter of Human Beings’ Rights and Responsibilities, or COHBRAR for short. Now, that might have been cool.

March 30, 2008 - Posted by Jeremy Gans | s 6: application | | 2 Comments

2 Comments »

  1. I just stumbled across this blog and am loving it. I wish more academics at the Law School were doing stuff like this.

    In regards to the name, while COHBRAR would have been cool, I think COHRAR is the clear winner of all the options.

    I look forward to learning more about the Charter, a topic I know horribly little about.

    Comment by Devon Whittle | April 6, 2008 | Reply

  2. [...] just stumbled across Jeremy Gans blog covering the Victorian Charter of Human Rights (or COHBRAR). It’s a really good read and I would recommend it to you. I wish more academics were willing [...]

    Pingback by [MINI]New blog on the Victorian Charter of Human Rights | James5 | April 6, 2008 | Reply


Leave a comment